opinion in Daniels following remand

, the court concluded that “Daniels was convicted for exactly the type of ‘habitual or occasional drug use’ that we said, in Connelly, could not support an indictment (let alone a conviction).”The Department of Justice has not sought Supreme Court review of the Fifth Circuit’s  opinion in Daniels following remand. Bruen has changed the Second Amendment landscape by, among other things, replacing the two-step inquiry that had been typically used by the lower federal courts when considering Second Amendment challenges with a history-focused methodology. The majority in Bruen indicated that the approach it endorsed is “neither a regulatory straightjacket nor a regulatory blank check ดูหนังออนไลน์