historical tradition of firearm

On August 9, 2023, a panel of the Fifth Circuit reversed. The Fifth Circuit first determined that Daniels belongs to the “law-abiding” class of individuals protected by the Second Amendment, reasoning that the universe of “law-abiding” individuals historically excluded only “felons and the mentally ill.” The court then concluded that the historical regulations presented by the government were insufficiently comparable to Section 922(g)(3) to establish a historical tradition of firearm regulation justifying the provision’s application to Daniels. First, the court explained that the government had not identified any “Founding-era law or practice of disarming ordinary citizens for drunkenness, even if that intoxication was routine.” “[A]t no point in the 18th or 19th century did the government disarm individuals who used ดูหนัง24